Pta Texas Congress

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510159992
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
Phone
4699396815
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$176,394
Expenses
$138,863
Assets
$158,652
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lacey Laude (President)

People named in this filing

  • Lacey Laude (President)
  • Tyler McKelvy (1st VP: Fundraising)
  • Karen Burnell (2nd VP: Governance)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the Brentfield Elementary PTA is to promote the welfare of children and youth in their homes, schools and communities through the collaboration of parents, teachers, school administration and the public on various programs, committees, conferences and projects.

What it reported doing in 2025

A) Direct Classroom Support (through the purchase of educational technologies such as One Book One Brentfield, through our LEAD fund [special fund for teachers to make specific requests for materials] and through our Library fund which provides new books to our library on a regular basis for student use) B) Teacher and Staff Support (through paid continuing education workshops, salary payment of substitute teachers so teachers may perform parent conferences during the school day vs in the evening or not at all, twice monthly snack, breakfast or luncheon events, holiday gifts, birthday gifts and the supply of two room parents to assist each teacher with field trips, celebrations and weekly filing projects) C) Community Building Events (through our Carnival, Buddy Fun (Field) Day, Multicultural Night, STEM Day, Red Ribbon Week, Arts in Education competition and ceremony, Family Fun Night and various educational speaker events), Social Dances, After-School Programs D) Sister School Support - Dobie Elementary (through school supply drives, coat drives, holiday toy drives, reading buddy program, teacher appreciation luncheons and special requests as needed throughout the year) E) District Support (through staffing the District's Clothes Closet and Used Book Fair as well as cash contributions to the car seat and scholarship funds)

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 65% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.45 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.3%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.14; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 41 of 41 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 12 of 13 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.