Pta Pennsylvania Congress

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262662800
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Chester Springs, PA, USA
Phone
6104695108
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$53,118
Expenses
$49,724
Assets
$74,696
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ashley Jakubik (President)
  • Brittani Ruble (1st Vice President)
  • Keely Dadamo (2nd Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Ashley Jakubik (President)
  • Brittani Ruble (1st Vice President)
  • Keely Dadamo (2nd Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpse of the West Vincent Elementary School PTA is to promote the welfare of children, raise standards of home life, advocate for laws that further education, physical and mental health, welfare and safety of children, promote collaboration of families and educators, serving all students in the West Vincent Elementary School in grades kindergarten through sixth grade.

What it reported doing in 2024

Other described in schedule O - 6th grade outing $709, 6th grade promotion gift $422, All Pro Dads $931, Alumni Scholarship $500, Annual PTA Project $672, Earth Day Celebration $831, Game Day $496, Homeroom Funds $1,480, Mental Health $253, Reading Incentive $510, Science Fair $158, Staff Appreciation $1,585, Kindergarten Welcome $112, Totaling $8659

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 41
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 40.4%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: 42.8%; rating input score 43

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.4%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.5; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.1% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -9.9% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 40.4% of revenue deployed · 42.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.