Pta Oregon Congress

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931276769
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Corvallis, OR, USA
Phone
5417575941
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,257
Expenses
$10,932
Assets
$18,128
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Michel Wiman (Co-President)
  • Jay Munyon (Co-vice president)
  • Analuz Torres (Co-vice president)

People named in this filing

  • Michel Wiman (Co-President)
  • Jay Munyon (Co-vice president)
  • Analuz Torres (Co-vice president)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Garfield Parent Teacher Association is a bilingual and multicultural group that supports Garfield Elementary school in a number of ways. We are a Title 1 school in the Corvallis SChool district. The PTA helps to create a sense of community among all Garfield families, no matter the language they speak at home by hosting events that provide an opportunity for families to get to know each other and to help Garfield School. We increase the financial support for Garfield through fundraisers such as dine-outs, grants, and school-wide events. Funds raised pay for things like school equipment, field trips, lego robotics, and classroom supplies.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Community Building Events Fund provides students and their families with fun events, that include food and activities; these events include Gardening Parties, School picnics, holiday parties, movie nights, literacy events, and a book swap.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 43.2%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.