Pta New York Congress
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883926038
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Montrose, NY, USA
- Phone
- 0000000000
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $102,044
- Expenses
- $122,261
- Assets
- $79,754
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Rebecca Chess Pettit (Co-President)
- TaNitra Watson (Co-President)
People named in this filing
- Rebecca Chess Pettit (Co-President)
- TaNitra Watson (Co-President)
- Dana Goyer (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose and mission of the Hendrick Hudson Elementary PTA is to provide enrichment experiences to the children in the elementary schools of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District We primarily serve the children from PreK to 5th grade
What it reported doing in 2024
Student Community Enrichment - examples of the programs we funded through this category include but are not limited to 5th grade graduation t-shirt student gifts homework folders for students yearly use field day equipment class trips in school assemblies in class enrichment like reading book bags and classroom supplies
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 89% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 61
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.2%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 56.9%; rating input score 57
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 75%; rating input score 75; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.8%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.2% of revenue deployed · 56.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $70K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.