Pta New York Congress 12-035 Miller Hill-sand Lake Pta
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237007665
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Averill Park, NY, USA
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,489
- Expenses
- $67,129
- Assets
- $70,153
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Katlyn Willis (President)
- Allison Slavin (Vice President)
- Dan Brooks (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Katlyn Willis (President)
- Allison Slavin (Vice President)
- Dan Brooks (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support the children and youth in schools to assist parents in nurturing their children to encourage parent and public involvement in schools as well as to provide a variety of support enrichment activities field trips and family and community events for the students of Miller Hill Sand Lake Elementary School.
What it reported doing in 2024
Events - Author Visits Family Bowling Field Day Fifth Grade Farewell Event Holiday Store MLK Day of Service Winter Dance Arbor Day Ice Cream Socials Book Giveaway Family Reading Night Fifth Grade Moving Up Ceremony Fine Arts Night Spring Service Day Spring Enrichment benefitting the 350+ students of Miller Hill Sand Lake Elementary and their families plus school staff
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 91% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.6%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 50%; rating input score 50
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.2%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 25.3% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54.6% of revenue deployed · 50% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $34K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.