Pta New York Congress 10-073 Oaks School 3 Pta
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 116075969
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Oceanside, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5166787564
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $59,306
- Expenses
- $46,386
- Assets
- $52,134
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LAUREN PALMERI (PRESIDENT)
- JENNY ENGLISH (PRESIDENT)
- EMILY ENGLISH (1ST VICE PRESIDENT MEMBERSHIP)
- DARRA BATTINO (2ND VICE PRESIDENT WAYS & MEANS)
- STEPHANIE BETTES (2ND VICE PRESIDENT WAYS & MEANS)
- CAITLIN BETTES (3RD VICE PRESIDENT EVENTS/AIE)
People named in this filing
- LAUREN PALMERI (PRESIDENT)
- JENNY ENGLISH (PRESIDENT)
- DEZIREE BRANDI (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support education and advocacy by parents for students
What it reported doing in 2024
Welcome back event, staff appreciation, mini calendars, awards and installation dinner, cultural arts, school spirit decorating, family reading night, lunch time club, parp, pta reflections program, school photography, welcome committee
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.8%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 80.3%; rating input score 80
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.8%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.8% of revenue deployed · 80.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $37K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.