Pta New Mexico Congress New Mexico Pta
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850121400
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5058810712
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $120,774
- Expenses
- $88,834
- Assets
- $189,420
- Liabilities
- $76,750
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dawn Delfin (President)
- Ashley Giron (President-Elect)
People named in this filing
- Dawn Delfin (President)
- Ashley Giron (President-Elect)
- Tami Baker (VP of Membership)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
PTA's mission is to make every child's potential a reality by engaging and empowering families and communities to advocate for all children.
What it reported doing in 2024
State Convention - New Mexico PTA supports local PTAs and their members in the State of New Mexico by providing year-round support, training, and by sponsoring an annual convention where local PTA members have an opportunity earn leadership, treasurer, and other education-related skills. It also gives the members the opportunity to learn about national/world-wide medical issues, have a chance to engage in different forums with experts in their fields (teen pregnancy, bullying, suicide, drug use, etc.).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.6%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 66.4%; rating input score 66
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.4%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.13; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.41; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.6% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.6% of revenue deployed · 66.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $59K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.