Pta Maryland Congress of Parent & Teacher Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521335766
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Port Republic, MD, USA
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$41,053
Expenses
$32,762
Assets
$17,589

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kimberly Cardwell (PTA President)
  • Stephanie Barone (PTA Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Kimberly Cardwell (PTA President)
  • Stephanie Barone (PTA Vice President)
  • Lachon Dade (PTA Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Educational Charitable See Schedule O

What it reported doing in 2023

Cultural Arts Enrichment - arranged and funded performances and visits by musicians artists and authors. All students and teachers benefitted. Specialized Programs - funding special educational enhancement grants specific to only one portion of the student body. Includes shirts and celebrations for the 5th grade and shirts for destination imagination and math clubs. Benefitted approx 80 5th graders and DI members. Promotion of School Spirit - includes a Fun Run shirt for every student and staff member to proudly display their school spirit Benefitted all students and staff

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.6%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.2%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $38K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2009 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.