Pta Kansas Congress of Parents and Teachers
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 481033125
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Overland Park, KS, USA
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $79,805
- Expenses
- $57,751
- Assets
- $95,132
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Lori Ruf (President)
- Jennifer Bhargava (Vice President of Volunteers)
- Erica Benson (Vice President of Advocacy)
- Rebecca Linn (Vice President of Fundraising)
People named in this filing
- Lori Ruf (President)
- Jennifer Bhargava (Vice President of Volunteers)
- Erica Benson (Vice President of Advocacy)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote the welfare of students in their schools homes and community and to promote collaboration and engagement of families and educators in the education of children.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community Engagement - Throughout the year the PTA hosts numerous events in order to bolster schools communities involvement in activities benefiting students and their families. For example this includes evening events surrounding the promotion of STEM educational game nights talent shows kindergarten roundups.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 41% for direct work, and 59% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.8%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 83.9%; rating input score 84
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.6%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.65; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 34.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.8% of revenue deployed · 83.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $48K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.