PTA Georgia CONGRESS - Indian Knoll ES PTA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 274811958
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Canton, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7707216600
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $60,786
- Expenses
- $26,841
- Assets
- $46,785
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jeanette Smith (Co-President)
- Michelle Woltz (Co-President)
- Amy Gilliam (Vice President)
- Alex Morris (Vice President)
- Haley Sanford (Vice President)
- Leslie Smith (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Jeanette Smith (Co-President)
- Michelle Woltz (Co-President)
- Melanie Muhlfelder (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
PTA's mission is to make every child's potential a reality by engaging and empowering families and communities to advocate for all children.
What it reported doing in 2024
Program services including house meetings, student incentives, field day support, and similar
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 25.6%; rating input score 26
- Program expense ratio: 58%; rating input score 58
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 55.8%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.74; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 25.6% of revenue deployed · 58% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $16K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.