PTA Florida CONGRESS - David Fairchild Elementary PTA

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510210226
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Miami, FL, USA
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$78,714
Expenses
$88,147
Assets
$80,662

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Charissa Pal (President)
  • Marissa Jacobs (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Charissa Pal (President)
  • Marissa Jacobs (Vice President)
  • Melissa Hussain (Corresponding Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To make every childs potential a reality by engaging and empowering families and communities to advocate for children. To promote the welfare of children and youth in school and bring a closer relationship between home and school teachers and parents.

What it reported doing in 2024

Community Development and Curriculum Enrichment Program: Promote activities that cultivate a bigger sense of community and enrich our kids development. Our major projects were to promote STEAM activities in our school and to launch the Green initiatives through the introduction of the Shared Table project reducing food waste in our school . We provide planners and folder to all students to enhance their learning & time management. Also under this program we support: Botany Club FEA Future Educators of America Safety Patrols Student Council and WKID Internal TV Station. In addition we support Kindness Projects Red Ribbon Week and Career Fair. All of this activities enrich our kids experience during their elementary years. Lastly we held a free movie night event open to the community to engage the development of the community around the school.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 71% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 57% for direct work, and 43% for grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 44
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 46.5%; rating input score 46
  • Program expense ratio: 41.5%; rating input score 41

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.6% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 46.5% of revenue deployed · 41.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $37K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.