PTA Florida CONGRESS- Bartram Springs Elementary PTA

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270667087
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Phone
0000000000
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,051
Expenses
$41,769
Assets
$18,020
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Elizabeth Arflin (President)

People named in this filing

  • Elizabeth Arflin (President)
  • Hailey Gorman (Vice PresidentMembership Coordinator)
  • Nicole Walker (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

1 Fall Festival and CSS Trail of Treats events These events were free to all 1100 students The festival family friendly event that brought the local school community and business community together To further inclusivity with our CSS students a separate location and time was established for a smaller venue more sensory friendly movement and activities 2Reflections program- This National PTA Program Theme was Accepting Imperfections and was free for 1100 students This arts program allowed students to use 2D artwork to represent the theme This was the 1st year we conducted the program and it was a well received event with three students moving forward to the district level judging 3 Science Night- STEM themed was a free event for all 1100 students There were 4 exhibits 1 program and 6 interactive stations Separate area for our CSS students to work but still be involved if they needed a quieter space

What it reported doing in 2024

Fall Festival and CSS Trail of Treats events These events were free to all 1100 students The festival family friendly event that brought the local school community and business community together To further inclusivity with our CSS students a separate location and time was established for a smaller venue more sensory friendly movement and activities

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 16.7%; rating input score 17

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,269%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -13.3% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 16.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 17/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.