Pta California Congress of Ptas - Palos Verdes Peninsula Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237050633
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Palos Verdes Estates, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3103789966
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $111,212
- Expenses
- $125,024
- Assets
- $30,974
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARGARET LIOU (PRESIDENT)
- MARIO SNOW (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
- JENNY HANSEN (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- TRISHA FLORES (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
- LIZ FLAHIVE (4TH VICE PRESIDENT)
- ALEXANDRA STEWART (5TH VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARGARET LIOU (PRESIDENT)
- MARIO SNOW (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
- JENNY HANSEN (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the palos verdes peninsula council of ptas is to coordinate efforts among all sixteen ptas within the palos verdes unified school district. Those efforts include improvement of technology, implementation of school safety and red ribbon week programs, and coordination of the reflections program honoring student achievement in music, literature, poetry, art and photography.
What it reported doing in 2024
The pvp council provides the necessary funds to allow officers to attend the annual California state pta convention. It also provides for continuity to smooth transitions by sponsoring workshops and training programs for all incoming officers of pta/ptsa units.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 60% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.4%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 48.4%; rating input score 48
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.4%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54.4% of revenue deployed · 48.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $60K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.