PTA California Congress of Parents Flory School PTA

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 770514994
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2014–2016
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2012
Location: Moorpark, CA, USA
Phone: 8053786303
Rating: 70
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Parent/Teacher Group

Reported finances

Revenue: $26,587
Expenses: $21,544
Assets: $22,971

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

Erin Fujioka (President)
Nicole Sinutko (Vice President)
Priti Joshi (Vice President)
Rutu Chatre (Vice President)

People named in this filing

Erin Fujioka (President)
Sonia Soto (Executive VP)
Nicole Sinutko (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide financial and volunteer support for the programs and activities at the Flory Academy of Sciences and Technology Elementary School

What it reported doing in 2016

Provide classroom and recreational supplies and playground equipment that benefit the students and programs at Flory Elementary School

Operating model

Revenue model: Other-operating. 93% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model: Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 80% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 66
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 56
Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 60.9%; rating input score 61
Program expense ratio: 75.2%; rating input score 75

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: 19%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: -23.5% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 22.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 60.9% of revenue deployed · 75.2% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $16K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
Schedules: 3 filed schedules
Filing history: 3 filing years from 2014 to 2016
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.