Psychiatric Foundation of North Carolina

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
560746063
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Raleigh, NC, USA
Phone
9198593370
Rating
41
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$34,433
Expenses
$11,415
Assets
$86,417

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Stephen Buie MD DLFAPA (President)

People named in this filing

  • Burt Johnson MD DLFAPA (Director)
  • John Gilmore MD (Director)
  • Donald Buckner MD DFAPA (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Organization's Primary Exempt Purpose: The Foundation is organized for charitable, educational, and research purposes, including but not limited to: educating the public about psychiatry, psychiatric illnesses, and treatments; increasing public awareness of psychiatric illness and availability of treatment; enhancing quality of assistance to the psychiatric patients; support training, education and research to improve care of psychiatric patients; removing discrimination; undertaking other projects for public benefit; and providing support to the NC Psychiatric Association in its efforts to achieve these purposes.

What it reported doing in 2024

Design and maintenance of a web-based directory to increase public awareness of availability of services, enhance quality of assistance to the patient by educating treating professionals of access to services, to provide education & training to improve care of patients, & to support a research project to improve access to care for patients

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 4
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.1%; rating input score 2
  • Program expense ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 6

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 66.8%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.57; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.4% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 2.1% of revenue deployed · 6.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $715 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.