Pssi Washington Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 113792466
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Bethesda, MD, USA
- Phone
- 5713193717
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Boy Scouts of America
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $624,236
- Expenses
- $610,282
- Assets
- $1,186,565
- Liabilities
- $4,823
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROGER W ROBINSON JR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ROGER W ROBINSON JR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $210,000 total reported compensation
- JANA ROBINSON (COO): $105,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Pssi Washington is dedicated to helping advance a better understanding of the security challenges facing the czech republic and other post-communist states, particularly in light of an increasingly resurgent russia.it likewise seeks to contribute to the public policy debate on both sides of the atlantic, including with respect to the connectivity between transatlantic security concerns and the growing security risks emanating from the asia-pacific region. Finally, pssi Washington intends to help communicate, explain and predict u.s. Security policy perceptions and responses concerning key global flashpoints.
What it reported doing in 2024
China/capital markets transparency initiativepssi Washington inc. Launched its china cmti in march, 2019, an issue area that had been the subject of intensive research by pssi principals since 1998. This public policy education program reached "critical mass" internally when pssi's executive director prepared a 105-page report for the u.s. National security council entitled national security dimensions of china's corporate presence in the u.s. Capital markets. Submitted in july 2018. Pssi was the world's first NGO to pursue such a financial intelligence and warfighting initiative, focused on how u.s.-sanctioned, blacklisted and other chinese corporate "bad actors" have been funding themselves and their predations to the tune of scores of billions of dollars annually via the u.s. Debt and equity markets and private equity funds). U.s. Investor funding of the chinese communist party (ccp) and the people's liberation army (pla) has taken place over some 25 years and totaled in the trillions of dollars. A troublingly significant number of roughly 5,000 publiclytraded chinese corporate securities traded in the u.s. Capital markets are held by as many as 75-100 million unwitting american retail investors.in the period since its launch, this issue has been catapulted by pssi to the presidential level and engaged several cabinet agencies with foreign policy and national security mandates, including the departments of treasury, state, defense, commerce, odni , nsc, the national economic council and the sec. Members of congress and several congressional committees -- on a bipartisan basis -- have also taken up this new issue area and passed several pieces of legislation. In one high-profile case, pssi Washington's executive director, roger robinson, was responsible for uncovering, analyzing and publicizing the issue of u.s.-sanctioned chinese companies and other corporate "bad actors" in the process of being added to the list of investments of the federal thrift savings plan. The release of this data created widespread opposition to this planned development and ultimately led to president trump's direct intervention in 2020. Moreover, pssi Washington is also presently providing researchfindings to support a fox nation documentary series entitled underwriting the enemy, hosted by fox business anchor, maria bartiromo and now in its fourth season.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 63
- Accountability: 40
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.9%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 84%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $96.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.2%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.94; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 51.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.9% of revenue deployed · 84% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $513K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $210K · 5 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.