Psaila Welfare

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
592065414
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2011
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2011
Location
Moss Point, MS, USA
Phone
2284758687
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Insurance Providers

Reported finances

Revenue
$60
Expenses
$4,669
Assets
$11,360

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The plan is a welfare benefit plan that provides health benefits to eligible employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement between local 1988 international longshoremen's association and employers who are members of the pensacola steamship association. It is subject to the provisions of the employee retirement income security act of 1974 (erisa).

What it reported doing in 2011

Not required for a voluntary employees' beneficiary association.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7,681.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.43; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 76.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -30% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2009 to 2011
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.