Prytula Foundation USA

What it reported doing in 2025

Safe communities initiative projectthe organization implemented the safe communities initiative project to enhance the protection and safety of civilians in conflict-affected regions of ukraine. All program activities were exclusively charitable and focused on civilian protection, with no involvement in military or combat operations.program activities included the deployment of civilian early warning systems designed solely for public alerting and safety purposes, the reinforcement and improvement of shelters used by civilian populations, and the provision of communication tools and essential safety resources. These systems and resources were installed and distributed in residential areas, schools, and other civilian infrastructure to improve preparedness and reduce risks associated with aerial attacks and other threats impacting civilian populations.the organization worked with vetted local partners and community stakeholders to identify high-risk areas and ensure that assistance reached vulnerable civilian populations. All resources were distributed and monitored in accordance with internal controls to ensure their use exclusively for charitable and civilian protection purposes.as a result, participating communities experienced improved access to protective infrastructure, increased awareness of emergency protocols, and enhanced capacity to respond to security threats, contributing to safer living conditions and continuity of essential civilian activities.

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
• Program expense ratio: 97.8%; rating input score 98
• Fundraising efficiency: $109.23 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: Limited
• Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
  • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
  • Requires narrative reports: Pass
  • Conducts field audits: Fail
  • May suspend future funding: Fail
  • Requires financial reports: Fail
  • Conducts site visits: Fail
  • Requires grant agreements: Pass
  • May require repayment: Fail
• Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Pass
  • Document-retention policy: Pass
  • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
  • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Pass
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

• Operating margin: -15.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: 40% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: -8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: -45.8% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings