Prytanean Womens Honor Society

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
451564942
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
Location
Davis, CA, USA
Phone
5307605408
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,087
Expenses
$8,473
Assets
$2,623
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Katell Brady (President)
  • Chehak Kaur (Service Vice President)
  • Stephanie Franks (Social Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Katell Brady (President)
  • Chehak Kaur (Service Vice President)
  • Stephanie Franks (Social Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Prytanean Women's Honor Society is an educational and service oriented nonprofit organization dedicated to recognizing and honoring the scholastic achievement of undergraduate women at the University of California, Davis. The organization promotes academic excellence, leadership development, and fellowship among women with diverse backgrounds, goals, and interests. Through a wide range of community service initiatives, campus engagement projects, and collaborative programs with local organizations, Prytanean provides meaningful service to both the university and the broader Yolo County community. Established to support women's success in higher education, the society continues to uphold its founding purpose of empowering women, fostering supportive networks, and securing recognition for women of achievement.

What it reported doing in 2025

During the tax year, Prytanean Women's Honor Society organized a total of 12 fundraising activities to support its philanthropic mission. These activities included partnerships with local business, such as Regal Cinema, Lazi Cow, and Yoloberry, and engaged both members and the broader campus community. Funds raised through these events supported the organization's charitable initiatives and community service efforts, such as donating to Empower Yolo. In addition to fundraising activities, the organization also hosted multiple programs designed to empower women and strengthen women's leadership on campus. These activities included Dinner for 10, several social and service activities, and Prom that helped members develop confidence, professional skills, and a supportive social network. Approximately 100+ students participated in these programs throughout the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Member-benefit provider. The nonprofit used 79% of its reported program spending for member benefits.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.8%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.