Providence Mobilization Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881831418
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Deerfield Beach, FL, USA
- Phone
- 7869259149
- Rating
- 38
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Sexual Abuse, Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $174,969
- Expenses
- $175,213
- Assets
- $15,094
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ENOS MOURA FILHO (PRESIDENT)
- ELIEL P ASSIS (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ENOS MOURA FILHO (PRESIDENT)
- ELIEL P ASSIS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ANDRE MAZETTO (TREASURE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
PROVIDENCE MOBILIZATION provides support to missionaries and organizations through education, teaching, and financial distribution to missionaries and organizations of nations and languages around the world, but mainly in Nepal. Provides support to poor communities and to poor families in its needs through projects and programs that rescues and promotes human dignity in a concrete and inclusive way, fighting against human trafficking of children for sexual slavery.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024 was supported 20 missionaries and 13 local organizations in Nepal, 1 in Italy, 1 in New Zealand, and 5 in Brazil through religious education, training, and the distribution of US$ 164,558 in financial resources. Programs addressed basic needs such as food and healthcare, and implemented initiatives to rescue and protect children from sexual trafficking. Approximately 2,000 individuals were directly impacted by these efforts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.1%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 46.4% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 45.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.