Providence House Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
341336325
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Cleveland, OH, USA
Phone
2166515982
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,316,315
Expenses
$5,123,922
Assets
$14,319,220
Liabilities
$1,795,600

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

36 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NATALIE A LEEK (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • NATALIE A LEEK (PRESIDENT & CEO): $247,613 total reported compensation
  • KRISTEN A KOLLAR (CFO): $160,185 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission: providence house protects at-risk children and supports families through crisis, strengthening communities to end child abuse and neglect.

What it reported doing in 2024

Providence house provides four programs to keep children newborn through 12-years-old safe, and their families together during times of crisis. We provide for children's physical, emotional, developmental, and educational needs, and support families through counseling, connections to resources, and cultivating nurturing practices. We strengthen the community by advocating for underserved families and demonstrating the lasting impact of family preservation. In fiscal year 2024-2025, 2,141 children and families were served between all our programs. Families turn to providence house when they (continued on schedule o) are experiencing active crisis and seeking safe, emergency shelter for their children and support for their family so they do not lose custody. Last year, 214 children were admitted to our crisis nurseries and provided with 3,695 days of care. Children were served in our traditional family preservation crisis nursery services and our emergency placement program in partnership with the cuyahoga county division of children and family services. Additionally, families from throughout greater cleveland participated in our family preservation services during their child's stay at providence house. This included 699 parent visits, 309 referrals for additional support services, 772 case management sessions, 189 parent support sessions, and distribution of 144 bus passes to help address transportation barriers that prevent many of our clients from accessing services. Through our unique, multi-generational crisis nursery model, 99.5% of children returned home to their parent or guardian after staying at providence house, and 98% of our families were fully engaged in our preservation services. Additionally, 91 families participated in our voluntary aftercare program to receive ongoing support including case management and weekly group parent education. To further serve the community, providence house provided 1,106 essential need items to 312 families through our community referral program. Providence house is primarily funded through private donations from foundations, corporations, individuals, groups, and receives some government grant funding. We do not charge our families any fees for our services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 60% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.3%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 82.6%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.79; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.3% of revenue deployed · 82.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 34 of 34 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $248K · 36 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 43/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.