Providence After School Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260319193
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Providence, RI, USA
- Phone
- 4014909599
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,974,019
- Expenses
- $2,144,968
- Assets
- $2,697,500
- Liabilities
- $934,622
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANN DURHAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (TO 06/25))
Highest reported compensation
- ANN DURHAM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (TO 06/25)): $142,622 total reported compensation
- GAUTAM SARIN (FINANCE DIRECTOR): $109,165 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Providence after school alliance (pasa) helps close persistent opportunity gaps among providence youth by supporting and expanding access to and engagement in an ecosystem of high-quality out-of-school time learning environments.
What it reported doing in 2024
Pasa helps close persistent opportunity gaps among providence youth by expanding access to and engagement in an ecosystem of high-quality out-of-school time learning environments. Over two decades, pasa has built two expanded learning initiatives in collaboration with the city of providence, the providence public schools, and the local community: the afterzone for middle school, and the hub for high school. By working in tandem, the afterzone and the hub have helped over 17,000 young people in providence stay on track to graduate and engage in their own learning with multiple and diverse learning pathways from 6th grade to graduation.as a free, citywide, after-school network for middle school youth, the afterzone provides young people with access to a wide variety of arts, sports and stem programs that offer self-driven opportunities for the development of new skills, experiential learning that feels relevant to youth, and incorporates youth voice, choice and career exploration. The hub builds upon the afterzone by ensuring that the benefits of a coordinated system of enriching after school learning opportunities don't end when middle school students leave 8th grade and provides deeper learning opportunities to high school youth. With a focus on college and career readiness, the hub's enrichment and credit-bearing programs enable youth to gain the critical 21st century skills they need to be successful in the classroom, workplace, and broader community. Key to ensuring that young people experience positive outcomes from the afterzone and hub is pasa's commitment to continuous quality improvement. Pasa offers a yearlong calendar of free professional development opportunities to over 50 community organizations and provides ongoing coaching and technical assistance to youth workers. Youth outcome assessments administered each year enable pasa to measure and document progress in our graduate profile skills: problem solving, perseverance, communication, teamwork, and engagement in learning.in fy25, respondents to the afterzone program survey indicated that participation positively impacted them:80% said it helped them find out what they were good at and what they liked to do;83% said afterzone helped them to get along better with friends;82% said afterzone helped them make new friends;82% said afterzone helped them feel good about themself; and,72% said the program made them want to come to school more often.at the high school level, results from the hub survey showed:92% of respondents reported increased learning interest; 92% reported a positive change in critical thinking skills; and, 78% reported a positive change in their academic motivation.additional hsa measures (% respondents with positive change):92% action orientation92% relationship with peers89% empathy89% reflection84% assertiveness75% perseverance75% optimismpasa's middle and high school models as well as its quality system have been replicated in over 40 cities around the country supported by training and technical assistance provided to interested cities. Pasa knows youth will succeed in school and make more informed career and college choices when they have experienced learning beyond the classroom that captures their passions, imaginations, and talents.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 77% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.3%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 73.3%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $20.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.7%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.26; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.3% of revenue deployed · 73.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $143K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.