Proud Ground
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931290320
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2023
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5034930293
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,431,464
- Expenses
- $2,197,669
- Assets
- $68,438,304
- Liabilities
- $11,648,133
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DOMINIQUE MERRYWEATHER (Executive Dir.): $151,507 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide permanently affordable home ownership opportunities using the community land trust model, under which proud ground administers subsidy funds to buy down the purchase price of homes. Resale provisions ensure homes' permanent affordability.
What it reported doing in 2024
Homebuyer, homeowner and outreach servicescommunity outreach deliberate research and dialogue resulted in an outreach strategy that has increased the organizations service to communities of color and strengthened its ability to understand and break down barriers for these households. The organization uses a combination of grass roots activities, partnerships, and outreach strategies to reach underserved communities with information about the organizations homeownership program and home buying opportunities. All outreach activities incorporate culturally-responsive materials and methods, with translation and interpreters provided to non-english speakers.home buyer education and counseling a key component of the organizations programs and services is its hud-approved, education and counseling provided to prospective and active home buyers. Hud and neighborworks certified counselors assist households working towards mortgage readiness through individual coaching and referral topics that include debt reduction; improving credit scores; budgeting; and creating a savings plan. Educational opportunities are also provided in bi-monthly newsletters and workshops.homebuyer criteria all of the organizations homebuyers are required to attend:(1)the organizations free homeownership orientation class;(2)homebuying 101 class, an 8-hour education class provided by a separate, approved organization.these education requirements are in addition to the requirements that homebuyers meet income and other funder-required criteria (e.g., first-time homebuyer status).post-purchase, homeowner support to promote homeowner stability and success, the organizations homeowners have access to a variety of resources. Post-support services include the offer of home inspections by project management staff to provide recommendations for home maintenance; ida matching grants for approved home repair and maintenance projects and for energy efficiency upgrades; homeowner newsletters, surveys, and workshops throughout the year; assistance with home loan refinancing and other lender-relation issues.membership the organization is a membership organization. Membership is open to anyone who lives or works in proud grounds service area and donates at least $25 a year; all the organizations homeowners are automatically members. The organization issues regular newsletters and one annual report to all members, stakeholders, donors, and funders. The organization also holds an annual meeting at which members and others in attendance receive an organizational update and elect the board of directors, unless the election is conducted by mail.resale of homes the organization facilitates the resale of homes on land held in trust to new eligible homeowners. From 1999 to 2024, there have been one hundred twenty four (124) such sales.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 17.6%; rating input score 18
- Program expense ratio: 89.4%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $83.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 80.8%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 31.14; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 17.6% of revenue deployed · 89.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $152K · 16 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $911K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.