Protectors of Pine Oak Woods Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510161823
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Staten Island, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7184770545
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,101
- Expenses
- $21,048
- Assets
- $100,169
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSE RAMIREZ-GAROFALO (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOSE RAMIREZ-GAROFALO (PRESIDENT)
- JACK BOLEMBACH (FIRST VICE P)
- ANDREW BIANCERO (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is not for profit formed for the purpose of land conservation. Public and membership education regarding the value of natural areas through bulletins and mailings. Formed to pursue environmental research to protect staten island's parklands engages in forest restoration workshops, to plant native species of trees and shrubs and to remove invasive plants. Creates videos of parklands of staten island for local community television broadcasts.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization was formed for the purpose of land conservation. Public and membership education regarding the value of natural areas through bulletins and mailings. Formed to pursue environmental resesarch to protect staten island's parklands engages in forest restoration workshops, to plant native species of trees and shrubs and to remove invasive plants create videos of parklands of staten island for local community television broadcasts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -23.1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.76; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.