Protection from Abuse Security Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810811375
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Turnersville, NJ, USA
Phone
8568039494
Rating
45
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Protection Against Abuse

Reported finances

Revenue
$80,028
Expenses
$101,568
Assets
$8,142
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Steven Dana (CEO Director)

People named in this filing

  • Steven Dana (CEO Director)
  • Michael Saltman (Director)
  • Marshal Davis (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organizations primary purpose is to provide safety and security related advocacy services and education to victims of abuse and violent crime including domestic violence sexual assault stalking human trafficking and all other violent crime

What it reported doing in 2023

PROGRAM Risk and Threat Assessment and Advanced Safety Planning DESCRIPTION Provide risk threat and vulnerability assessments to victims to help them understand their risk of future violence or victimization including potential lethality for domestic violence victims Through Advanced Safety Planning we provide risk treatment strategies to improve victim safety and outcomes ACHIEVEMENTS Provided the described program services to 785 individuals during the fiscal year SHORT TERM OBJECTIVE To educate clients relative to their risk threat and vulnerabilities and implement risk treatment strategies to reduce client risk of re-victimization or violence LONG-TERM OBJECTIVE Continue to scale the program to provide services to more individuals in FY24 without a substantive increase in operating budget The organization is also Introducing a standardized safety planning approach to victim safety which it has been teaching to other advocates Continue to provide and host training workshops to train other advocates relative to the proper approach to safety planning and risk treatment strategies in order to improve victim outcomes NOTE We do not have the ability to break down how much of the program was funded by a grant as we only have the ability to track global service numbers and the grant does not fully fund our programs

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 3
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3.3%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 3

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -26.9%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 77.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -113.9% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3.3% of revenue deployed · 2.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 7 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series revenue component sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.