Promoting Health in Haiti Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
113084957
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2012
Location
East Elmhurst, NY, USA
Phone
7185655978
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$49,157
Expenses
$31,790
Assets
$113,181
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Carmelle Bellefleur (chief executive officer)
  • Carol Roye (Vice President)
  • Henri Desrosiers (President)

People named in this filing

  • Edward Hazel (Doctor)
  • Carmelle Bellefleur (chief executive officer)
  • Carol Roye (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of Promoting Health in Haiti, Inc. (PHH) is to improve the health and wellness for the citizens of Haiti by educating highly skilled nurse practitioners to provide primary care and mental health care. We re expanding to other third world countries at their request.

What it reported doing in 2024

PHH sponsors, and provides funds, faculty, and curriculum expertise to the State University of Haiti to provide both a bachelors and a masters level Nurse Practitioner program for the University. The funds are provided to the University for classroom space, security, and utilities. PHH also pays for the four month clinical training for all students. The University confers degrees on the graduating students. PHH provides teachers and curriculum.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 78% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.7%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35.3%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.56; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -52.8% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -70.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $32K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.