Promise For Heroes Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 921381981
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Cape Coral, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3092590010
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $105,008
- Expenses
- $3,424
- Assets
- $114,379
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mark McCulley (President)
- Anthony Perillo (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Mark McCulley (President)
- Denise Perillo (Treasurer)
- Anthony Perillo (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promise for Heroes Inc currently hosts an annual fund raising event consisting of a Banquet, Golf Outing to raise money for First responders and organization and individuals who have suffered a catastrophic even and are in need.
What it reported doing in 2025
As follow-up to the 2025 year with Promise for Heroes. We organized our efforts to raise money to donate to American Heroes that were Military Veterans, First Responders, Police, and Public Servants that are in need from there service to this country. Our main effort was the charity event held November 15, 2025. It was a golf outing followed by a dinner and a live auction to raise funds. As a result, from our efforts and thanks to generous donors we sent a $95,000 check for support to the Tunnel for Towers Foundation in January 2026.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 28.4%; rating input score 28
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 96.7%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 33.41; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -53.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -24% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 106.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 28.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $30K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.