Prologue Theatre

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
824641050
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Arlington, VA, USA
Phone
7033822012
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Theater

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$310,952
Expenses
$327,593
Assets
$22,620
Liabilities
$15,817

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Christie Johnson (President)

People named in this filing

  • Christie Johnson (President)
  • Irene Levy (Treasurer)
  • Doug Wilder (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Prologue Theatre's vision is to use theatre as the catalyst for, and to then sustain, open and inclusive community discussion and discourse. Its mission is to present theatre performances and educational programs that start public conversations about important world issues, challenging the community to examine and discuss their views of the world and those around them.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, Prologue Theatre produced two full length productions. Marjorie Prime at the Atlas Performing Arts Center in Washington, D.C. and The Horse and Carriage at Prologue's office and rehearsal space in Arlington, VA. Full-length productions require sets, costumes, props, lights, and sound as well as the theatre artists (actors, director, designers, stage manager, and over-hire staff) to create the piece in addition to advertising and marketing for each play and lobby materials for the audience. In addition, for our New Works Program, foreword, we brought together a group of artists to devise and adapt Emil and the Detectives. After conducting the first week of development at Prologue in February, the piece was workshopped at The Kennedy Center for a week in June as a part of their Local Theatre Residency Program and was asked to come back in August for the Local Theatre Festival to present a reading of the piece to an audience. Artist time in June and August as well as puppets and props created for the piece were funded by The Kennedy Center grants. This will likely be a one-time only experience as the programs were discontinued in 2025. Prologue Theatre has continued to experience challenges of filling seats for performances. Although the potential audience size was less, producing on a smaller scale in Arlington in December gave us full control over our own ticket sales as well as realizing the full value of tickets sold less fees (something we do not have when we rent space at Atlas; they control ticket sales and take 10% of the ticket value as part of the rental). Despite it being among our largest costs, we have continued to prioritize maintaining the space we rent in Arlington, VA as appropriate and available commercial space for theatre usage remains virtually nonexistent in our area. Other small theatres recognize the potential we offer in the community and supported us this year with marketing swaps and donations, in addition to grants received from The SHARE Fund, The Lange Foundation, Morgan Stanley GIFT, and Schwab Charitable.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.2%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 78%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.07; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.7; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.2% of revenue deployed · 78% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $256K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.