Project Weber/RENEW
Legal name: Project Weberrenew
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460964136
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2016, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Providence, RI, US
- Phone
- 401-383-4888
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,415,776
- Expenses
- $4,108,656
- Assets
- $5,957,620
- Liabilities
- $2,608,205
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- COLLEEN DALEY NDOYE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- COLLEEN DALEY NDOYE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $137,536 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Project Weber/RENEW provides peer-led harm reduction and recovery support services, builds relationships with the people we serve, and fights for systemic change. We empower people who engage in drug use and/or sex work to make healthier and safer choices in their own lives.
What it reported doing in 2024
Project weber/renew (pwr) provides a full range of harm reduction, recovery, and basic needs services to men and women, including the transgender community. During 2024, pwr's programs focused on the following areas: recovery support/overdose prevention: project weber/renew continued to provide peer-led street outreach and walk-in services. During outreach and in our drop-in centers in providence and pawtucket, and our team stationed in kennedy plaza, we distributed approximately 14,000 naloxone doses to reverse overdoses. Pwr provided over 1,300 weeks of sober living support for clients in early recovery as well as providing referrals to detox or treatment, and peer recovery coaching. Project weber/renew staff also transported clients to detox/treatment over 300 times. At risk case management and basic needs: project weber/renew provided basic needs and case management support to approximately 18,000 individuals across over 21,000 encounters -- ranging from distribution of food and water to providing clients with clothing. Of those, many also received case management support, such as replacement or changing of identification documents, medical, social and housing services navigation or advocacy, and employment guidance. We provided case management and basic needs at two drop-in centers and via outreach. HIV/hcv prevention and navigation: project weber/renew works with numerous partners to slow the spread of HIV/hcv through multi-tiered efforts. As a prevention effort, project weber/renew distributed over 41,000 condoms to individuals at high-risk for HIV and/or hcv. Pwr continued to engage in street outreach utilizing three outreach vans, targeting high-risk individuals for HIV and hcv. Pwr provided HIV and hcv testing to clients. For clients with existing or new HIV diagnoses, pwr staff provided navigation services to remain in or return to care with the goal of achieving viral suppression for HIV-positive clients, as well as support through the treatment process for hcv-positive clients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 71% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.6%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 93%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $251.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.45; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.3%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 31.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 34% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 40.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 59.6% of revenue deployed · 93% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $138K · 14 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $228K reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.