Project Triple 7

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
392221439
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Hot Springs, AR, USA
Phone
5015450777
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,200
Expenses
$32
Assets
$1,168

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • TARA MAHEND (DIRECTOR)
  • CLAUDE MAHEND (DIRECTOR)
  • SHARONDA LONG (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of our organization is to provide affordable housing and services for adult males and females transitioning from substance abuse, jails, and mental health facilities in the state of Arkansas.

What it reported doing in 2025

Project triple 7 was incorporated as an Arkansas domestic nonprofit corporation on may 19, 2025, and received recognition of tax-exempt status under internal revenue code section 501(c)(3) from the internal revenue service in july 2025. The organization's exempt purpose is to provide affordable housing and supportive services for adult males and females transitioning from substance abuse treatment, jails, and mental health facilities in the state of Arkansas.the 2025 tax year was the organization's initial formation and startup period. During the year, the board of directors focused on establishing the organizational infrastructure necessary to deliver program services in future years. Activities included: completing state incorporation; obtaining the employer identification number; preparing and submitting form 1023-ez; securing IRS recognition of 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status; recruiting and seating an initial three-member board of directors; opening organizational banking relationships; and registering a web domain for future outreach to clients and donors. No direct program services were delivered to individuals during 2025. Direct service delivery is anticipated to begin in 2026.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.7%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 97.3%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 36.5; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 2.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $32 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.