Project Sixlove Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922544915
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Wellesley, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6178218596
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $143,218
- Expenses
- $81,835
- Assets
- $90,602
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Caitlin Blasco (Director)
- Meghan Swenson (Clerk; Director)
- Robin Malouf (Treasurer; Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Project sixlove corp's purpose is to make a difference in the lives of children, families and our communities by improving their mental and physical health, education and recreational opportunities. Project sixlove corp. (the "corporation) is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes including for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. To maximize our impact on our current efforts we may seek to collaborate with other non-profit organizations which fall under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code and are operated exclusively for education and charitable purposes. At times, per the discretion of the board of directors, we may provide internship or volunteer opportunities which will provide for involvement in said activities and programs in order to have a greater impact for change.
What it reported doing in 2025
Mental Health Collaborative - nonprofit that works to reduce stigma and improve mental health literacy by educating and empowering communities to proactively support mental well-being. (Grants $ 5,000)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.9%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 97.8%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.9%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 28.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 56.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 102.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.9% of revenue deployed · 97.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $80K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.