Project Remand Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411226139
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- St Louis Park, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6512662992
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Administration of Justice, Courts
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $400
- Expenses
- $369,647
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT A AWSUMB (PRESIDENT)
- JESSICA MCCONAUGHEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROBERT A AWSUMB (PRESIDENT)
- JESSICA MCCONAUGHEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ROBYN A MILLENACKER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide safe and effective alternatives to traditional detention and prosecution.
What it reported doing in 2021
Project remand, inc. (the organization) is a private Minnesota not-for-profit corporation established in 1973. The organization provides pretrial release, diversion, and referral services to ramsey county. The screening unit provides verified screening information as mandated by court order and the Minnesota rules of criminal procedures. Additionally, this unit provides information regarding physical and psychological problems and public defender eligibility. The organization attempts to assist defendants by recommending release or attempting to divert appropriate cases from the criminal justice system to supervision by the organization's case managers. In addition to supervising defendants on conditional release or diversion, the organization also provides intensive case management services and makes assessments and referrals to appropriate agencies concerning chemical dependency problems.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96.7%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -92,311.8%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $358K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.