Project of Easton Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
231699851
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Easton, PA, USA
Phone
6102584361
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,321,796
Expenses
$2,434,857
Assets
$5,803,141
Liabilities
$142,133

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KIM CHECKEYE (CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • SHARON DIFELICE (PRESIDENT)
  • LINDA TRETIAK (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • KIM CHECKEYE (CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $142,667 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Project of easton, inc.'s mission is to "build a better community by helping people to help themselves and education is key. Project was founded in 1968 by protestant, jewish, and catholic community leaders to provide coordinated services to an underserved population in easton, Pennsylvania. Today, our education, workforce preparation, and safety net programs address the alarming poverty and low-literacy rates in the region by providing adults and children with holistic and integrated academic, life skills, and basic needs programming that helps them to break the cycle of poverty. Our programs help more than 5,000 people every year to receive the support they need to rise out of poverty and to succeed in school, work and life. Our clients go on to college, jobs and self-sufficiency, ready to participate in and improve their communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Lifelong learning: education services adult literacy: project's success academy provides an adult literacy program that prepares disadvantaged adults for the workforce. Courses include ged preparation, english as a second language, and adult basic education. Our certified teachers use real-world contexts to prepare students for success in college, training programs, and/or employment.in addition to classroom instruction, tutors work with studentsone-on-one to prepare them for the ged test, u.s. Citizenship test, or to improve their english-language skills. Each student receives personal, educational, and economic support, including access to project's food pantry and emergency assistance services as needed.our program prepares adults to successfully carry out their roles and responsibilities as workers, citizens, and parents.goal: the goal of the adult literacy program is to improve adults' literacy skills and prepare them for the workforce, post-secondary education or training, and/or u.s. Citizenship.2024 - 2025 results392 students participated; 82% of students were post-tested; 86% made statistically significant learning gains;47 students earned their general equivalency diploma (ged);5 children attained their early childhood education diplomas (pre-k);6 students achieved u.s. Citizenship;5 students completed english as a second language (esl);63 total graduates family literacy: project provides a family literacy program that recognizes that a parent's literacy, attitudes, and beliefs toward education significantly impact their children. Our program breaks the inter-generational cycle of low literacy and economic disadvantage by providing four integrated program components including: adult literacy education, parenting education and support, high quality pre-school and structured parent/child literacy opportunities. This "teach the parent/reach the child" model assists parents in becoming the first and most important teacher of their children and promotes the child's success in school, while also advancing the parent's ability to advance educationally and economically.goal: the goal of the family literacy program is to break theintergenerational cycle of illiteracy. 2024 - 2025 results43 families participated;57 children participated in our family literacy program: 32 in our ece and 25 school-aged58% of parents made statistically significant learning gains;82% of children demonstrate developmental progress in the "key experiences" of childhood using the child observation record (cor) and infant toddler child observation record (it cor) sizzle! : project's sizzle! The program addresses the "summer slide" learning loss that occurs for elementary-school-age children. For disadvantaged children who may already have a reading achievement gap, this "summer slide" can significantly undermine future success in school. Our program is a free summer day camp for low-income, at-risk children in grades k-5 in the easton area school district (easd). The goal of the six-week program is to increase or maintain reading scores.sizzle! Provides children with an academic intervention using high quality, evidence-based reading instruction aligned with thepennsylvania state education standards. The program also provides a fun, developmentally appropriate opportunity for summer activity, enabling enrolled children to keep up with their more advantaged peers and begin a new school year more confidently.goal: to prevent summer slide in reading skills by identifyingat-risk students and providing intensive reading instruction tomaintain or increase reading levels. 2024-2025 (sizzle! 2024) resultsenrolled 138 students45% (62/138) of enrolled children attended at least 20 days (85% attendance)56% (35/62) of children who attend at least 20 days maintained or gained literacy skills using star 360, dibels 97% (60/62) of children who attend at least 20 days maintained or gained literacy skills using curriculum-based assessments (cbas) 55% (76/138) of enrol

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 91
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 62.1%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 82.5%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.7%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.38; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62.1% of revenue deployed · 82.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $143K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.