Project Management Institute

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 710964878
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2017–2025
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2016
Location: Olympia, WA, USA
Phone: 3602808343
Rating: 36
Verdict: REVIEW
Rating confidence: Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue: $21,180
Expenses: $29,497
Assets: $62,831
Liabilities: $0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

Juan Nieves (President)
Allison Ragasa (President Elect)
Noel Villarreal (Past President)

People named in this filing

Juan Nieves (President)
Allison Ragasa (President Elect)
Noel Villarreal (Past President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Professional Development organization

What it reported doing in 2025

Administrative costs related to facilities and catering expenses to support monthly chapter meetings, board of directors meetings, Coffee chats and related activities (includes professional development, membership support, and related services)

Operating model

Revenue model: Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 0
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 41
Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: -39.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.13; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: -20.2% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: -15.7% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2025
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.