Project Left Behind
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264823072
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Naples, FL, USA
- Phone
- 6197230052
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $54,620
- Expenses
- $17,613
- Assets
- $236,382
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEVIN LIVOLSI (CEO)
People named in this filing
- KEVIN LIVOLSI (CEO)
- DANIELLE LIVOLSI (CFO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Project left behind's mission is to support vulnerable children in peru by strengthening children's homes and improving access to education. We fund essential residential-care needs, including daily meals and staff support that create a safe and stable living environment. We also fund educational services such as teachers and tutoring to help children stay on track academically. When needed, we provide basic resources that remove barriers to learning and well-being. Our goal is to create stability today and long-term opportunity through consistent care and education.
What it reported doing in 2025
Project left behind's primary program service is providing ongoing financial support to the hogar semillas de jesus children's home in peru. Project left behind funds a full-time cook to provide consistent, nutritious meals for children living in the hogar semillas de jesus children's home in peru. This role supports daily meal planning, food preparation, kitchen hygiene, and safe food handling critical for children's health, development, and stability. The cook also helps ensure dietary consistency and reliable meal schedules, which is especially important in residential care settings. This service directly advances plb's mission by meeting essential daily needs so children are healthy and able to focus on school and emotional well-being.project left behind funds an afternoon-shift elementary teacher to support the academic growth of children in the home, including structured instruction and learning reinforcement. This role helps children keep pace with school requirements, build foundational literacy and math skills, and develop strong learning habits. The teacher also provides individual support when children need extra help due to learning gaps or disrupted early schooling. This program service improves educational outcomes and strengthens long-term opportunities for children in care.project left behind funds an afternoon-shift high school teacher to provide ongoing academic support for older students, focusing on coursework completion, exam preparation, and skill-building needed for graduation. This role helps students remain engaged in school and reduces the risk of falling behind, which can be a major barrier for youth in residential care. The teacher supports consistent study routines and provides targeted help in subjects where students struggle. This program service strengthens graduation readiness and supports pathways to vocational training, higher education, and employment.other support activities include: children's home operating support (utilities such as electricity, water, and internet); cleaning and hygiene supplies; maintenance and repairs; medications/vitamins/doctor needs; school supplies and school fees; clothing/shoes/bedding; computer equipment and household supplies/furniture; recreation/cultural activities; family visits and transportation support; training/therapies/workshops; safety/security items (e.g., extinguishers/signage); other educational/tutoring support roles (e.g., tutor coordinator, evening tutors, reinforcement teachers); and required payroll-related costs/benefits (as applicable).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 47.3%; rating input score 47
- Program expense ratio: 99.5%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 67.8%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.42; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8.9% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 47.3% of revenue deployed · 99.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.