Project Kompass Incorporated

What it reported doing in 2024

During the year ended june 30, 2025, project kompass (pk) accomplished the following: residents: pk welcomed 39 residents, bringing the total served to 137 to date.pk expanded its staffing by adding an office manager and a part-time facilities position.approxmimately 75% of graduates obtained permanent housing or successfully reengaged with family.pk provided "resets" for 2 former residents, reinforcing pk's long-term support.pk stepped up to provide emergency housing for 4 displaced jobcorps students who lacked family supports after the federal program was cut.pk continued to embrace and support lgbtq+residents, particularly those in gender transition.community service/outreach: pk assisted nearly 100 individual/families each month with food, school and baby supplies, hygiene products, clothing, and service referrals. Pk provided temporary hotel stays (2-4 weeks) for families experiencing homelessness due to lack of shelter in the region.pk supported local youth and community efforts by: - serving lunch to 220 campers in the lowell youth leadership program. - adopting a street with the lowell litter krewe. - delivering holiday care packages to unhoused individuals multiple times throughout the year. - sponsoring the kindness initiative program at shawnessy school in partnership with connor's kindness program.collaborations/partnerships: pk strengthened food program collaborations with the merrimack valley food bank and mill city grows. Pk partnered with the wish project and collaborated with healthy families, the city of lowell homeless commission, greater lowell health alliance, and other community organizations. Growth: pk launched expansion into a community center to meet increasing food, housing, and health needs.

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 56.9%; rating input score 57
• Program expense ratio: 73.8%; rating input score 74
• Fundraising efficiency: $20.5 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: Limited
• Foreign activity oversight: Limited
• Grant itemization coverage: Limited
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Fail
  • Document-retention policy: Fail
  • CEO compensation review process: Pass
  • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Fail
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

• Operating margin: 22.8%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.88; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 28.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings