Project Homeless Connect Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204331462
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2011
Forms available
Form 990 2010, Form 990-EZ 2011
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4152151199
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$80,349
Expenses
$131,768
Assets
$449,820

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Over 3,769 community volunteers partner with government agencies, non-profits and the private sector every two months to provide a one-stop shop of health and human services for 5,000 homeless san franciscans.

What it reported doing in 2011

-216 accupuncture treatments were given to clients-116 banking service consultations were provided, resulting in many clients opening bank accounts-1,033 benefits meetings took place-606 dental screenings were performed-566 employment interviews and services were given-1,733 eye exams were performed and eyeglasses distributed-456 families who are homeless came for counseling-4,191 lunches were served to homeless clients-45,475 pounds of groceries were given-436 harcuts were completed-296 HIV tests were performed-52 homeward bound trips were arranged to assist homeless people's return home-592 housing information counseling meetings were conducted with clients-690 dmv state id's were issued-456 legal meetings were held-303 massages were performed on clients-610 medical service interactions were made, connecting many clients with primary care providers-219 behavioral health, substance abuse, or methadone connections were made-1,080 phone calls were made to family and friends-205 podiatry treatments were given-296 shelter reservations or stabilized housing were achieved-105 veterans service connections were provided-226 veterinary care and pet sitting served dogs, cats and other pets-352 voicemail accounts were opened-47 chiropractic treatments were given-111 adult probation service connections were made

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -64%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.41; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -63.6% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.4% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.