Project Fire Buddies
Legal name: Project Fire Buddies Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843955561
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2023
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Tinley Park, IL, United States of America
- Phone
- 872-259-0010
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $862,898
- Expenses
- $538,039
- Assets
- $646,437
- Liabilities
- $223,921
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- KURT DEGROOT (CHIEF EXEC.): $13,455 total reported compensation
- RYAN BALLARD (CHIEF OPER.): $12,707 total reported compensation
- DANIELLE N ABENDROTH (CHIEF FIN. O): $11,212 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Project Fire Buddies brings joy to kids struggling with critical illnesses. We believe that no child should fight their battle alone.
What it reported doing in 2023
We want to provide as much assistance as possible to the families of our fire buddies. Providing gifts, once in a lifetime experiences, or needed medical devices are great ways that we help the families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.3%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 85.1%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37.6%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.9%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 82.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 86.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 53.3% of revenue deployed · 85.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $458K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $13K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.