Project Bully Indiana Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463309618
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Daleville, IN, USA
- Phone
- 3178618247
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Public, Society Benefit N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $-1,344
- Expenses
- $0
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Stephanie Coomer (President)
- Kay Rutledge Beard (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Stephanie Coomer (President)
- Kay Rutledge Beard (Vice President)
- Stacy Clevenger (Secretary and Volunteer Coordinator)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Project Bully Indiana, Inc. was an advocate for bully-breed dogs and provides education to the public about safe and equal treatment for all dogs, it educates the community about pet overpopulation and responsible pet ownership, it encourages the community to adopt shelter pets, and it works to bring affordable spay and neuter services to the community. It is no longer active.
What it reported doing in 2014
Project Bully hosted a couple of pet events designed to educate the community about responsible pet ownership and the horrors of dog-fighting. It also attended several community pet events and distributed information about shelter animals, and encouraged "adopt, don't shop" and spay/neuter programs. Project Bully sponsored several shelter dogs and worked to find foster and permanent homes for them. Project Bully provided free and reduced spay neuter benefits to several community, shelter and foster dogs. It is no longer active.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 3
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -100%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.