Project Big Wood a Nonprofit Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 882750423
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Ketchum, ID, USA
- Phone
- 2083093457
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Water Resource, Wetlands Conservation and Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $884,641
- Expenses
- $755,307
- Assets
- $209,028
- Liabilities
- $9,012
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KENNY VAN ZANT (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CHAD CHORNEY (BOARD MEMBER)
- ROSS COPPERMAN (BOARD MEMBER)
- NICHOLAS MILLER (SECRETARY/TR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Project big wood is organized to improve the environmental health and ecology of the big wood river basin in central Idaho by protecting, enhancing, sustaining and reconnecting the big wood river, its tributaries and its watershed.
What it reported doing in 2024
Project big wood fy 2024-2025 focused on expanding the scientific foundation required to rebalance and restore the big wood river watershed. As hydrologic variability increases and demands on the system intensify, our work centers on generating credible data, refining restoration priorities, and strengthening collaboration across user groups. The mission of project big wood is to create a better big wood through data, education, advocacy, and earthworks. Data during fy 2024-2025, project big wood continued implementation and expansion of its watershed monitoring programs to strengthen long-term baseline datasets and inform restoration and management decisions. Activities included: - ongoing monthly water quality sampling across established monitoring sites in partnership with science on the fly - laboratory analysis of dissolved organic carbon, nitrates, phosphates, and chloride - continued evaluation of water quantity data through deployment and analysis of barometric loggers within the river and canal systems - advancement of a watershed-scale atlas incorporating lidar data, geomorphic mapping, wood presence, effective shade, and habitat suitability modeling - development of visual reporting tools to communicate monitoring results to stakeholders and the public these efforts establish a long-term scientific baseline that informs restoration prioritization, tracks watershed health trends over time, and strengthens the ability of stakeholders to make data-driven water management decisions. By maintaining consistent monitoring and integrating multiple datasets, project big wood supports informed, transparent, and adaptive watershed management across the basin. Continued next page education project big wood expanded community engagement and youth involvement in watershed stewardship throughout the fiscal year. Activities included: - engagement of volunteers and youth participants in water sampling and monitoring activities - collaboration with local outfitters, guides, and community partners to integrate citizen science into programming - public presentations and events highlighting watershed conditions and restoration efforts - distribution of visual water reports and state of the big wood to improve public understanding of river health trends - atlas 2.0 - pbw is advancing the development of an expanded, data-driven watershed atlas incorporating lidar data, geomorphic units, wood presence, effective shade, and habitat suitability modeling. These educational efforts strengthen community understanding of watershed conditions, increase public participation in stewardship and citizen science activities, and build long-term local capacity to support informed conservation and river health across the basin. Advocacy during fy 2024-2025, project big wood engaged stakeholders to support science-based watershed management and collaborative problem-solving. Activities included: - ongoing collaboration with irrigators and water users to better understand system-wide water movement and delivery dynamics - participation in community and stakeholder discussions regarding water management and river health - development of accessible data tools and story maps to improve transparency around watershed conditions - coordination with local and regional partners to align restoration priorities with broader water management objectives these efforts promote informed, science-based dialogue among water users, agencies, and community stakeholders, strengthening collaborative approaches to water management and long-term watershed resilience. Continued next page earthworks project big wood continued advancing priority restoration projects within the watershed from planning and assessment into development and permitting phases. Activities included: - funding fish screens for 25/26 installation within the canal systems - refinement of restoration designs using updated geomorphic and monitoring data - coordination with county, agency, and landowner partners
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.7%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 74.6%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.6%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 86.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 69.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 45.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.7% of revenue deployed · 74.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $563K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G fundraiser detail did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.