Project 11 11 Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 842232959
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Gardner, MA, USA
- Phone
- 8572931333
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $176,879
- Expenses
- $130,121
- Assets
- $64,728
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Vincent DeMarco (President)
- Erin Gallivan (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Vincent DeMarco (President)
- Erin Gallivan (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the organization is to: 1. Spread awareness to the public regarding disabled veterans, their needs and the mental health challenges they face; 2. "Peacefully assemble" to request signatures from the public in support of petitions for redress of grievances; 3. Exercise the right of "creative expression" by offering goods made by members of the organization to the public in order to facilitate raising of operational funds (Examples of goods offered: State Certified Homemade Baked Goods, Homemade Apparel; Etc). Goals of the organization also include assisting disabled veterans in any way they are in need which includes a tank full of gas, groceries, supplies or household equipment, or a meal.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our organization's second biggest program service achievement by expense are the vehicles we use. The vehicles are used to transport veterans to and from appoints, run errands such as grocery shopping for veterans, and to transport our volunteers to fundraising events to act on the first goal of our organization which is to spread awareness of disabled veterans needs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 9
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 18
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 7.4%; rating input score 7
- Program expense ratio: 10%; rating input score 10
- Fundraising efficiency: $4 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.4%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 31.8% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 67.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 7.4% of revenue deployed · 10% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.