Prohealth Home Care Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
200067392
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Waukesha, WI, USA
Phone
2629282981
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$20,934,341
Expenses
$22,191,645
Assets
$6,873,167
Liabilities
$2,699,081

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUSAN EDWARDS (PRESIDENT AND CEO - PHC)

Highest reported compensation

  • SUSAN EDWARDS (PRESIDENT AND CEO - PHC): $4,073,911 total reported compensation
  • PETER BACON (CHIEF BUS DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $1,190,028 total reported compensation
  • ANDREW GUTIERREZ (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $1,078,404 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Prohealth home care provides extraordinary home care services in the communities we serve.

What it reported doing in 2024

The corporation has been organized to conduct perpetually a residential hospice, which is maintained and operated for the care of persons suffering from terminal illnesses. The facilities are made available on an equal basis to all patients regardless of race, religion, disability, color, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, financial status, or place of residence. The residential hospice facility, angelsgrace, commenced operations on 5/3/2004, and during fy25 provided approximately 3,430 patient days of service. The corporation also provides skilled nursing, therapy and hospice services in patients' homes, and conducts educational activities relating to rendering hospice and home health care. During fy25, the corporation provided 29,008 routine days of hospice service, 23,923 nurse visits, 1,195 support care visits, and 31,667 therapy visits. During fy25, $87,771 in charity care was provided.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 81
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.8%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.39; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.8%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.8% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $19.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $4.1M · 10 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $412K reported
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 18 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.