Progressive Workshop of Armstrong County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251193788
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Kittanning, PA, USA
Phone
7245485664
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Sheltered Employment

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,012,190
Expenses
$4,202,634
Assets
$2,834,666
Liabilities
$317,539

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LYNN SIBLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • ROB WATT (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • L MICHELLE REEFER (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • L MICHELLE REEFER (CEO): $111,376 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's mission is: (1) to provide training facilities, placement programs and related activities for persons who appear to be able to profit from the habilitation programs of the workshop. (2) to provide extended training for individuals who continue to develop skills, behaviors, and attitudes which assist them in becoming more independent and employable and to provide these services in accordance with principles of "everyday lives" which enables individuals to participate in training and activities as they chose. (3) to conduct business and receive funds in order to accomplish purposes adopted by the corporation.the progressive workshop provides job skill training, rehabilitation services, and adult education services in an effort to develop, improve and enhance personal self-satisfaction and contributions to the community. In addition, the workshop provides job development and job coaching for those individuals who are work-ready, or who have secured jobs within the commu

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization continued to provide job skill training to approximately 126 individuals. During the fiscal year 2025, the organization had 22 individuals start the program and 10 individuals withdraw from services. The organization continued to support individuals placed into competitive employment situations. Others who are working in the community attend the workshop some hours in order to maintain and improve job skills as well as interaction with othersservices offered include: supported employment, transitional work services, pre-vocational (cps) and adult training facility.the adult achievement center (aac) was opened in march of 2017. This program targets individual ranging from 18-30 years old who are not ready to be enrolled in one of our other services offered. In september 2024 a second adult achievement center officially opened in leechburg pa, which targets young adults described above. As of today we have 8 individuals who attend either full-time or part-time.through its pre-vocational services, pwac maintains a full production facility that provides businesses throughout the greater pittsburgh area and beyond with sub-contract services. Pre-vocational training was provided on many jobs for which trainees earned wages based on piece rates. Their earnings provided them with an opportunity to become part of the community through realization of purchasing power, gaining independence and self-reliance. In addition, there was training on job seeking skills and support provided to individuals involved in community employment. Trainees continued to request access to services and participate in work and other activities outside the work environment through cps community based services. Community participation support (cps) (started in july 19) provides opportunities and support for community inclusion and building interest in and developing skills and potential for competitive integrated employment. Clients and trainees enrolled in cps spend approximately 25% of their time in the community, where they can attend volunteer opportunities, community events and much more. Services are provided based on the person's individual support plan (isp). Each person's team works together with the individual to develop outcomes and priorities for community integration activities based on the strengths and preferences of the individual. Individuals and families can choose the type and amount of service participation that is supported through the isp process. Transportation to cps activities is provided by pwac. Since the implementation of cps, our clients and trainees have experienced many new opportunities in the community! Here are just a few examples : yarnick's farm oakmont bakery sam's club harrison hills park king's lanes alameda kittanning and ford city libraries smicksburg farms and shoppes comparison shopping at local grocery stores ringing bells for the salvation army bingo bowling living treasures science center museums - volunteering at local food banks and more! Transitional work/ small group employment services do work and training based in the community. There are approximately up to 60 trainees in this program. Trainees enrolled in sge work in the community under staff supervision at a 1:2-3 ratio or a 1:1 ratio and earn an hourly wage of $7.75 hour. Trainees enrolled in sge have gained the skillset needed to work in many types of environments. For example, trainees travel to a business's location and assist with a project that needs additional manpower or can regularly assist an employer with ongoing needs. Trainees work in such locations as restaurants, hotels, manufacturing facilities, hospitals, and many more.the workshop again participated in a "day of giving" now sponsored through nextier bank and the accf. We received some matching funds for donations that were received on the designated date.we continued to review and implement policies that will provide additional training and have 2 people invoiced in accoun

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.1%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 81.8%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $28.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.7%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.1% of revenue deployed · 81.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $111K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.