Progress 64 West
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 743125836
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Saint Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3147071880
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Coalitions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $132,495
- Expenses
- $101,918
- Assets
- $68,387
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Debbie Shaw-Franke (Director & President)
- Rachel Treppler (Executive Director)
- Michael Hurlbert (Director & Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Tony Long (Director & Chairman)
- Debbie Shaw-Franke (Director & President)
- Jeremy Roth (Director & Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support, Grow and Foster Community Vitality.
What it reported doing in 2025
29. Monthly Member & Public Opportunity Enlightenment Conferences. Panel discussions by community thought leaders, purposed to inform and enlighten members and guests to become more kinowledgable and involved in their community. Topics include Trade Development, Real Estate, Financial and Infrastructure trends. $13,045.43.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 89% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 35.8%; rating input score 36
- Program expense ratio: 46.5%; rating input score 47
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.1%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 43.4%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 43.7% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 35.8% of revenue deployed · 46.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $47K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.