Professional Women of St Tammany Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270350449
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Mandeville, LA, USA
Phone
9857890811
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$58,966
Expenses
$61,465
Assets
$810,113
Liabilities
$15,324

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATABITHA PARKER (V.P. OF MARKETING/PAST PRESIDENT)
  • LYNNETTE BOUDET (PRESIDENT)
  • TIFFANY ROSE (PRESIDENT ELECT)

People named in this filing

  • KATABITHA PARKER (V.P. OF MARKETING/PAST PRESIDENT)
  • LYNNETTE BOUDET (PRESIDENT)
  • ANGELA OWEN (V.P. OF MEMBERSHIP)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Professional women of st. Tammany strives to educate, promote and support all women in st. Tammany parish through networking, information, scholarships and workshops. Professional women of st. Tammany also strives to elevate the standards for women in business and in the professions; to promote the interests of business and professional women; to bring about aspirit of cooperation among business and professional women of st. Tammany parish; to extend opportunities to business and professional women through education along the lines of industrial, scientific and vocational activities; and, generally, to do any and all things advisable, desirable or necessary in the interest of said business and professions.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization hosts monthly educational luncheons that provide timely education to women in the workforce or who are interested in starting or owning their own business.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.6%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 64.5%; rating input score 64
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.2%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.18; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.9% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 69.6% of revenue deployed · 64.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.