Professional Firefighters of Marion County Benevolence Fund Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320285305
IRS 990-PF coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2025, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Ocala, FL, USA
Phone
3522161092
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$122,563
Expenses
$107,589

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Support N.E.C.

What it reported funding in 2025

The foundation reported 4 filed grant rows totaling $41,998. The stated grant purposes included general donation, to aid in the mission of providing women free mammograms to promote breast cancer awareness and provide free breast cancer screenings to women who would otherwise not be able to afford them., and miscellaneous charitable purchases of food and supplies for individuals that would otherwise face hardship to provide these necessities for themselves and their family. this amount consists of multiple donations of food, clothing, and hygenic supplies as well as support for paying utility bills, medical bills, and funeral expenses to those individuals that applied for assistance., plus 1 other reported purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 88% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 100% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes to charitable grants and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of spending goes to grants and assets provide a limited cushion relative to annual grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: 100
  • Cost Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency: 100
  • Compliance: 100
  • Endowment Health: 13

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: 100%; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 39%; rating input score 39; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

  • Foundation activity disclosures: 19 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Payment to a government official: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
    • Excess business holdings: Pass
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Individual grants for travel, study or similar purposes: Pass
    • Grants outside qualifying charitable organization categories: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 9; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: 3.12; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
  • Payout: At least 100% grant deployment rate
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: 13th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 39/100.
  • High — Endowment Health: Endowment-health comparison scored 13/100.