Professional Firefighters of Kokomo 396
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 356043083
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Kokomo, IN, USA
- Phone
- 7654370911
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Labor Unions
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $111,334
- Expenses
- $94,567
- Assets
- $236,730
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Daniel Guffey (President)
- Adam Shaffer (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Daniel Guffey (President)
- Adam Shaffer (Vice President)
- Chris O'Neill (Sec Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
This organization's purpose is to protect and improve its member's interests and conditions of employment. Our Local also secures adequate work facilities, satisfactory working conditions, and a safe work environment. We negotiate employment conditions and job descriptions as well as wages and benefits. We also foster relationships with city councils, fire district boards, state representatives and senators, chamber of commerce, Red Cross, local missions, churches and youth groups, and a host of other local associations and charities with the goal of contributing to our community in a positive and productive way, without discrimination. Our organization functions cooperatively with the fire department focusing on service to the community, as well as to our members.
What it reported doing in 2024
Contract negotiations, member grievance resolutions, public awareness, member to access to labor related resources and member life and disability coverage these activities are ongoing functions of the org.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.1%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.5; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.4%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.