Professional Association of Childhood Educators Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811937063
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Sacramento, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9164443568
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Boards of Trade
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $146,259
- Expenses
- $231,269
- Assets
- $17,975
- Liabilities
- $75,366
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CATHY VAUGN (President)
People named in this filing
- CATHY VAUGN (President)
- LEAH ROSENTHAL-KAMBIE (VICE CHAIR)
- MARY LOU JOHNSON (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Professional Association of Childhood Educators Inc., (PACE) is a non-profit membership-based professional association in California for private childcare providers. PACE provides resources and services for early care and education professionals to enhance business management practices through education, networking and advocacy.
What it reported doing in 2017
PACE advances the early education community by: Advocating for the development, progress and welfare of all young children at the state and local legislative level so member voices are heardOffering a space to network, exchange ideas, policies and techniques among membersAdvocating for the benefits and standards of early childhood education to the general public to give members public exposure and help build enrollmentOffering programs which will enrich management techniques, teaching skills and curriculum so members can grow professionallyProvide the latest licensing regulations so that members stay informedOffer legal and personnel consultation from experts in the field
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -58.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.19; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -35.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -84.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.