Professional Ambulance Association of Wisconsin Inc

What it reported doing in 2025

The professional ambulance association of Wisconsin (paaw) was created in 2005 to represent the interests of ambulance services in the state of Wisconsin. Initially, the association was started to address revenue shortfalls in medicare and medicaid. It quickly became apparent there were many other needs and interests to pursue as well.paaw is registered with the state of Wisconsin ethics board as an active lobbying organization working with legislators and government leaders to provide a healthy, sustainable ems delivery system in Wisconsin. Annually, the paaw board of directors establishes a legislative agenda based on its goals and priorities, and that of ambulance services at-large in the state.paaw serves as an ems stakeholder group to better delivery of emergency medical services in Wisconsin. The association's board of directors and leadership continue to be called on to testify at government meetings or hearings regarding its position, or offer input on matters of importance. In addition, paaw works to create and promote opportunities for collaboration and networking between ambulance service executives, directors and managers.the primary purpose of the professional ambulance association of Wisconsin is to promote excellence and quality in the ambulance industry in Wisconsin and to; promote the general welfare of the emergency medical services; inform and educate the public as to the usefulness and value of emergency medical services; promote mutual aid in the emergency medical service which may include between members of the association; encourage and/or conduct research relating to any phase of the emergency medical service; disseminate to association members reliable information and data developed and/or gathered as to subjects of interest; create and maintain a fraternal feeling between the members of the association.

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: Limited
• Program expense ratio: Limited
• Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: Limited
• Foreign activity oversight: Limited
• Grant itemization coverage: Limited
• Major donor itemization: Limited
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Fail
  • Document-retention policy: Fail
  • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
  • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Missing
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

• Operating margin: 18.8%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: Limited
• Revenue growth: 35.6% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 27.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings