Pro Skills Futsal

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
881545978
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Sicklerville, NJ, USA
Phone
8563815662
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Soccer

Reported finances

Revenue
$156,439
Expenses
$152,991
Assets
$35,813

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Quam Dickson (President)

People named in this filing

  • Quam Dickson (President)
  • Ansger Otto (Secretary)
  • Allan Costa (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Pro skills futsal is a club-free supplemental skills and technical training for the privileged & mostly underprivileged kids that are interested in becoming a better soccer/futsal player regardless of their respective clubs. Is an outreach program for kids that are not opportuned to play at the elite clubs. We prepare those kids so as to earn a spot at the highest level.

What it reported doing in 2025

Pro Skills Futsal has achieved tremendous achievements in youth technical and skillfull areas of development individually and in competitive Futsal tournaments.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 99
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.8%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.2%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 30.1%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 39.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 31.8% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 34% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $153K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.